Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:34 am
by penguinboy
malcolmboston wrote:
iframes at the moment should be avoided, just as CSS2,
object classes etc should be avoided until several
'unnamed' browsers catch up.
FYI: Most people don't know but iframes are html 4.01.
W3C LINK
So any browser that supports html 4.01, should support the iframe.
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:27 am
by igoy
to Nay
Well, Flash is not just about eyecandy so that everyone can see it.
I been using flash to creat some admin panel for myself and my company since it can do some nice things.
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:31 am
by m3mn0n
penguinboy wrote:malcolmboston wrote:
iframes at the moment should be avoided, just as CSS2,
object classes etc should be avoided until several
'unnamed' browsers catch up.
FYI: Most people don't know but iframes are html 4.01.
W3C LINK
So any browser that supports html 4.01, should support the iframe.
Just because a browser supports a specification, doesn't mean it supports
all of the specification.
/me wants a standardized browser framework that supports everything =\
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:36 am
by malcolmboston
thank you
<-- was feeling bullied
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:03 am
by Draco_03
Normal frames would work good, but.. mhh iframe would work on Mozilla anyways so what s the prob ?