Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:24 am
by pickle
scorphus wrote:Hi pickle, did you read my post and follow that link?
Not as closely as I should have I guess :oops:

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:34 am
by leenoble_uk
qads wrote:no extra pipe :roll:
Yeah but no, you're just being faecetious with your code trying to not use implode.
Yes yes it's possible to do without using implode but are your convolutions really necessary. Implode is easier. :wink:

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:19 am
by qads
lol, i know :P, i just wanted to prove that you can do it without implode and still have no extra pipes :D.