Turing Numbers... Why so hard to read??

PHP programming forum. Ask questions or help people concerning PHP code. Don't understand a function? Need help implementing a class? Don't understand a class? Here is where to ask. Remember to do your homework!

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
seodevhead
Forum Regular
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Windermere, FL

Turing Numbers... Why so hard to read??

Post by seodevhead »

I fully understand why some forms use turing numbers for validation, but why does the graphic have to be soooo hard to read sometimes? Why not a perfectly legible/readable graphic? How does making the graphic hard to read further prevent spambots? Is there something I don't know? :?
User avatar
sman317
Forum Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:47 am

Post by sman317 »

So it can not be relaiably scaned by on OCR software used by a spambot. 8O
User avatar
seodevhead
Forum Regular
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Windermere, FL

Post by seodevhead »

Mann.... have I underestimated spambots that much!?!?! They use OCR for the turing numbers?????
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

seodevhead wrote:Mann.... have I underestimated spambots that much!?!?! They use OCR for the turing numbers?????
Good ones do.
Roja
Tutorials Group
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:30 pm

Post by Roja »

seodevhead wrote:Mann.... have I underestimated spambots that much!?!?! They use OCR for the turing numbers?????
And worse.. There are sites that pay people to complete turing numbers for other sites, or offer access to free adult material, and so on. Turing tests honestly are almost completely useless, however, because spambots are such a big problem even a minor improvement is worthwhile.

Personally, I can't stand them. I'd rather sites didn't use them, but it isn't my choice. :)
User avatar
seodevhead
Forum Regular
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Windermere, FL

Post by seodevhead »

What's a good option instead of using turing numbers?
User avatar
bokehman
Forum Regular
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 2:33 am
Location: Alicante (Spain)

Post by bokehman »

seodevhead wrote:What's a good option instead of using turing numbers?
A database of words that the spam might contain i.e. v1agra.
josh
DevNet Master
Posts: 4872
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 3:23 pm
Location: Palm beach, Florida

Post by josh »

seodevhead wrote:What's a good option instead of using turing numbers?
Email validation, and flagging accounts that sign up in a short period of time with the same email domain, or similar IP
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

I bet you could use the spamassassin perl script or C file to scan for spam in on a website even though it's intended for email. That sounds like an interesting project to play with :)

WordPress has some built in spam detection based on keywords... that would be simple enough to implement if you could get a good list of keywords to handle point scoring on.
Post Reply