did i break the validator???
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:50 pm
ok. seriously, why am i getting the errors with these pages??? did <frame *options*></frame> get switched to <frame *options* /> for 4.01?
is the sgml parser not realizing about the cdata???
issues with <frame>:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... finder.php
issues with cdata:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... tically%29
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... sp%3Dmoods
issue with refresh (this only occurs here... where i have a refresh)
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... tically%29
i don't understand why those are being called invalid since i can clearly see the pairings for the tags.
side note: only thing aside from the metadata not ending with /> the only non-xhtml compliance i might have is readonly and checked... are these both option="option"? and does anyone know why it would give me an issue with html 4.01 and <meta *options* /> ?
is the sgml parser not realizing about the cdata???
issues with <frame>:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... finder.php
issues with cdata:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... tically%29
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... sp%3Dmoods
issue with refresh (this only occurs here... where i have a refresh)
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... tically%29
i don't understand why those are being called invalid since i can clearly see the pairings for the tags.
side note: only thing aside from the metadata not ending with /> the only non-xhtml compliance i might have is readonly and checked... are these both option="option"? and does anyone know why it would give me an issue with html 4.01 and <meta *options* /> ?