Page 10 of 27

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:32 am
by Jenk
Ok.. in what format should we be presenting these ideas/suggestions for pages. Just a simple List, like:
Index page:

Welcome message
"What's hot/new"
Login box
Menu
Or diagrams? (such as a dummy page in static form)

Or both?

:)

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:42 am
by Benjamin
How about something like this in the wiki. Where Store links to a list of pages, and each page links to a list of features, and each feature links feature info, noes & discussion.

Store
--page 1
----feature 1
----feature 2
------extended feature information, notes & discussion
--page 2
----etc..
Admin

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:30 am
by sike
hey,

because i don't like the top down approach i wrote some requirements for products to get something started.

Code: Select all

Products :
	- must have a name
		
	- must have a price
		- fixed		
		- per size
		- as a special offer for a defined period
	
	- may have a description
	
	- may belong to 0..n categories
	
	- may have 0..n images
		- each image could have a subline
		
	- may have 0..n documents (e.g. detailed specifications)
	
	- may have 0..n properties (e.g. color, material ...)

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:06 am
by Oren
Although I'm sure there are at least more 1000 things to think of, sike's list looks pretty cool 8)

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 pm
by Luke
I thought of another name that you guys can consider. I like it!

NOS Commerce (and then sort of lean on a quick (NOS - Nitrous) type branding). NOS stands for Not OS Commerce.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:14 pm
by Jenk
I think it would be bad PR to use a name like that. And copyright issue.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:44 pm
by Oren
Jenk wrote:I think it would be bad PR to use a name like that. And copyright issue.
I'll second that.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:46 pm
by Luke
darn... oh well... Image

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:35 pm
by Luke
maybe... to make sure this thing keeps moving... we should set up some days/times where we have online meetings to discuss things. Anybody else second this?

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:20 pm
by Oren
Oren wrote:I'll second that.
:lol:

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:08 pm
by Jenk
am up for that. Although to accomodate time zones, perhaps we should utilise the wiki and have sections for discussions about various topics.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:14 pm
by Benjamin
I think we should have discussion pages in wiki. My schedule is wacked and random.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:24 pm
by Luke
Well if we don't have meetings, when is this stuff going to be worked out? I don't see how we can make any kind of decisions without some kind of meeting...

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:39 pm
by Jenk
There will be meetings, they'll just not be conventional, and will take time (days or even weeks) to complete.

If I knew how, would do myself, but the idea is to create discussions for the different topics, a topic being an issue or decision that needs discussion in order to resolve. Then we either have a timescale (say a week?) to come to a decision, or if the majority come to a decision. Which ever comes first.

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:42 pm
by Luke
I like that idea... how can we set that up?