FreeBSD Support :P
Moderator: General Moderators
That's the FPD1500 monitor with 15.1 inch screen.
Mine is the FPD1520 monitor with 15 inch screen.
Will it make a difference?
Mine is the FPD1520 monitor with 15 inch screen.
Will it make a difference?
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
As expected, I'm having troubles with the display 
I created an xorg.conf file and copied it to /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Then i used 'Xorg -config /etc/X11/xorg.conf' to test the configuration.
It does the same thing as before, the black/white checked background, mouse moves, but there's a black bar going through my screen (towards the bottom).
Here's what I put in my monitor section of xorg.conf
And here is the screen section
My monitor specifications are:
Horzontal frequency: 30-61
Vertical: 56-76
1024 x 768 x 70 mHz
24 bit (16 million)
--- don't know if this part matters, but here are my video adaptor specs
Intel 815EP Chipset Graphics Controller
4.00 MB RAM
windows driver file: i8lxdnt5.dll
(I believe this adaptor was automatically detected by xorg.conf as it appeared correctly in the xorg.conf file)
I created an xorg.conf file and copied it to /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Then i used 'Xorg -config /etc/X11/xorg.conf' to test the configuration.
It does the same thing as before, the black/white checked background, mouse moves, but there's a black bar going through my screen (towards the bottom).
Here's what I put in my monitor section of xorg.conf
Code: Select all
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Vendor Name"
ModelName "Model Name"
HorizSync 30-61
VertRefresh 56-76
EndSectionCode: Select all
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Card0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1024x768"
EndSubSection
EndSectionHorzontal frequency: 30-61
Vertical: 56-76
1024 x 768 x 70 mHz
24 bit (16 million)
--- don't know if this part matters, but here are my video adaptor specs
Intel 815EP Chipset Graphics Controller
4.00 MB RAM
windows driver file: i8lxdnt5.dll
(I believe this adaptor was automatically detected by xorg.conf as it appeared correctly in the xorg.conf file)
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
Okay, I'm on KDE now.
Things appear to be looking great. I fixed the bar in the middle of the screen by loading kde then switching to 70 mhz (it was on 75).. so the switching worked.
It's a bit bright.. kind of hurting my eyes
But I guess I can tone that down.
Is there anything else I should be aware of? Or is it just sit, explore, and enjoy now?
Edit: Actually this is quite hard on my eyes. I don't know why. It's on 1024x768 x 70mHz... the same as on windows.
Has anyone else had this experience before, when switching to linux.. most likely kde.
I need to be really careful because I have photosensitive epilepsy. I can have seizures if the screen refreshes too slow. Is there anything I should be aware of, or is it just because KDE is more graphically intense?
It's a bit bright.. kind of hurting my eyes
Is there anything else I should be aware of? Or is it just sit, explore, and enjoy now?
Edit: Actually this is quite hard on my eyes. I don't know why. It's on 1024x768 x 70mHz... the same as on windows.
Has anyone else had this experience before, when switching to linux.. most likely kde.
I need to be really careful because I have photosensitive epilepsy. I can have seizures if the screen refreshes too slow. Is there anything I should be aware of, or is it just because KDE is more graphically intense?
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
I had played with that before, I just lowered the brightness on my monitor. Seems to have worked.
Now for downloading stuff.. this is tricky!
Do I need to be logged in as root to download/install things?
I don't want things to be a mess, so I Imagine I should make a folder similar to 'Program Files' on windows?
Right now I'm at /home/scott
Would I install these programs in my directory, or will that make it not available to other people who sign on
*sighs* confused
Now for downloading stuff.. this is tricky!
Do I need to be logged in as root to download/install things?
I don't want things to be a mess, so I Imagine I should make a folder similar to 'Program Files' on windows?
Right now I'm at /home/scott
Would I install these programs in my directory, or will that make it not available to other people who sign on
*sighs* confused
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
- Chris Corbyn
- Breakbeat Nuttzer
- Posts: 13098
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
OK there's two ways to install software on Linux. You can either get a precompiled binary (like in windows), or you can get the source and compile it yourself (sometime's you don't have a choice).
Either way, most packages will run from your home directory once compiled but the tidiest thing to do is to install them as root.
There's more places on your linux system that are like program files in windows... it depends on the flavor but I'll attempt to summarise.
/usr/bin (Programs available to everyone - well, shortcuts to them)
/bin (More programs for everyone)
/usr/local/bin (More programs)
/usr/sbin (Porgrams intended for the root user only)
/sbin (More root user programs)
/opt (Some things end up here on some distros... kde resides here on my system)
Usually when you install from source you can specify the location to install at ./configure and it's usually
But just running often ./configure is enough and will go to it's default location (always read the INSTALL or README files first).
Binary installers are far simpler... but best idea... learn how your package manager works. I belive your distro installs from a portage tree (i think).
Either way, most packages will run from your home directory once compiled but the tidiest thing to do is to install them as root.
There's more places on your linux system that are like program files in windows... it depends on the flavor but I'll attempt to summarise.
/usr/bin (Programs available to everyone - well, shortcuts to them)
/bin (More programs for everyone)
/usr/local/bin (More programs)
/usr/sbin (Porgrams intended for the root user only)
/sbin (More root user programs)
/opt (Some things end up here on some distros... kde resides here on my system)
Usually when you install from source you can specify the location to install at ./configure and it's usually
Code: Select all
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/appnameBinary installers are far simpler... but best idea... learn how your package manager works. I belive your distro installs from a portage tree (i think).
BSD != Linux, and as a result, most of your post isn't accurate. There are *three* ways to install software on BSD: Ports, Packages, and by building from source manually.d11wtq wrote:OK there's two ways to install software on Linux.
Many of the paths you described are fairly different (or non-existant) on a BSD system.
There is a handbook - use it.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO885 ... /handbook/
It has sections on how to install software, what the filesystem structure is, and more.
To answer the large question ("Should I be root to install things"), the answer is NO, unless you absolutely have to.
For example, a webbrowser should be installed by a user - because the user will be the one using it.
A web SERVER however, has to be installed by root, because it runs as a priveledged process.
Whenever possible, limit yourself to a user.
Thats what your home directory is, sorta. Its where you put user-specific items. However, things install into proper paths, and its not centralized. Binaries go to several locations. Documentation goes to another. Its a different way of doing things, but its not alien to Windows users: Remember how applications install some files in the windows/system32 directory? Same deal.scrotaye wrote: I don't want things to be a mess, so I Imagine I should make a folder similar to 'Program Files' on windows?
- Chris Corbyn
- Breakbeat Nuttzer
- Posts: 13098
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
OK. I have never used BSD but I didn't realise there was that much of a difference. My badRoja wrote:BSD != Linux, and as a result, most of your post isn't accurate. There are *three* ways to install software on BSD: Ports, Packages, and by building from source manually.d11wtq wrote:OK there's two ways to install software on Linux.
These are the installation instructions for Yahoo! Messenger
#2 Why do I have to log in as root?
#3 I don't want to launch it by running a command, I want the icon on my KDE
See what I mean, lots of noobish questions
#1. Save the file WHERE on my machine. /home/scott ? /root ?FreeBSD Installation
Save the file to your machine.
Log in as root and type: pkg_add fbsd4.ymessenger.tgz to install the application.
Run /usr/bin/ymessenger from X Window to launch the application.
#2 Why do I have to log in as root?
#3 I don't want to launch it by running a command, I want the icon on my KDE
See what I mean, lots of noobish questions
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
- Chris Corbyn
- Breakbeat Nuttzer
- Posts: 13098
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
You have to get used to typing commands most of the time
It's all good fun in the end 
1. Save it where you like (I find /tmp is good)
2. Windows is insecure by not having this concept. With BSD/Linux you must log in as root to access certain parts of the filesystem the installer wants to put files in... half the reason you don't see viruses for such systems. The command "su" may offer you a login from the command line temporarily (super user)... type exit to get out of that mode again.
3. Get used to it
You'll be using the command line a lot. Once installed you should be able to use the Control Panel in KDE to add a shortcut in the K-menu or on the desktop if the installer doesn't make on for you.
1. Save it where you like (I find /tmp is good)
2. Windows is insecure by not having this concept. With BSD/Linux you must log in as root to access certain parts of the filesystem the installer wants to put files in... half the reason you don't see viruses for such systems. The command "su" may offer you a login from the command line temporarily (super user)... type exit to get out of that mode again.
3. Get used to it
Since root has to install it, I would probably save it to /root.scrotaye wrote:#1. Save the file WHERE on my machine. /home/scott ? /root ?
Dunno. Sounds like poor design. I highly recommend GAIM instead for all your messaging needs. Its opensource, it covers ALL the IM protocols (AIM, YIM, MSN-IM, IRC, ICQ, even google-talk and jabber!), and its more likely to be well supported on free/open platforms (like FreeBSD).scrotaye wrote:#2 Why do I have to log in as root?
Thats the command to *install* the application. It should add an icon for you. If it doesn't (which isnt totally uncommon), you will have to do it yourself, which isn't too hard.scrotaye wrote:#3 I don't want to launch it by running a command, I want the icon on my KDE