SEO best practice

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

SEO best practice

Post by alex.barylski »

Just noticed we do not have a SEO forum here...? So I posted in here as I am having troubles signing up an other SEO forums.

I took over an old site which was in need of an update...dropped the files and replaced them with SEF static URI's

Google unfortunately has many of those files cached and now they do not exist I am certain it's affecting our SEO. Should I redirect all permenently to homepage or have .htaccess return a 404 -- if that is possible or even the default as the files no longer exist.

I assume it takes SE's a while to clear their cache and start paying attention to the new files?
User avatar
Weirdan
Moderator
Posts: 5978
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 6:13 pm
Location: Odessa, Ukraine

Re: SEO best practice

Post by Weirdan »

User avatar
mikemike
Forum Contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Chester, UK

Re: SEO best practice

Post by mikemike »

If you still can, just put some rules in .htaccess for your old pages with permenantly moved http codes (301) to the new pages. This shouldn't affect your SEO too much. The link posted above will help, but only for Google, there are plenty of other SE's about being used, you shouldn't just be Google-friendly.

It's important that you use the 301 redirect, rather than something like header("Location: ...");
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: SEO best practice

Post by alex.barylski »

The thing is, the old pages made no sense, had zero structure and were best just being removed completely, so there is no re-mapping, just startingt from scratch.

Secondly the server is IIS and PHP so no .htaccess files...anyway around this using IIS config files or anything? :P
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: SEO best practice

Post by onion2k »

You should brush up on your HTTP codes. There's one for specifically for this: 410 Gone.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: SEO best practice

Post by alex.barylski »

Wasn't aware of 410 -- oddly I just read the document the other day while implementing a request object. :P

Anwyays, sounds like Google suggests, the best overall way is to use robots.txt and block the files which you delete.

Using header codes is out of the question, as the files are gone and they were all HTML and it's an IIS server with no mod-rewrite or ISAPI rewrite plugin either.

Alternatively, I could re-create the HTML files and leave a meta="nofollow" or similar tag...but again the files are gone and the directory is a lot cleaner now so I liked the sound of using robots.txt and letting time takes it course I guess.
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: SEO best practice

Post by onion2k »

PCSpectra wrote:Using header codes is out of the question, as the files are gone and they were all HTML and it's an IIS server with no mod-rewrite or ISAPI rewrite plugin either.
Can't you install one? http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/460/usin ... te-module/
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: SEO best practice

Post by alex.barylski »

No it's a shared server completely outside my control and the sysadmins know less than I do so I can't even be bothered. :P
Post Reply