Small tool

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

User avatar
dude81
Forum Regular
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:26 am
Location: Pearls City

Small tool

Post by dude81 »

User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: Small tool

Post by onion2k »

How do you know they made big money?
User avatar
dude81
Forum Regular
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:26 am
Location: Pearls City

Re: Small tool

Post by dude81 »

It is Google acquisition...
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: Small tool

Post by onion2k »

dude81 wrote:It is Google acquisition...
That's not how business works. Just because the buyer has loads of money doesn't mean they're going to pay a lot for something if they don't need to. ReCaptcha is a useful and interesting tool but it's not something that you could ever make much money from, so noone is likely to pay millions for it.

It seems more likely to me that CMU would have sold it for a small amount of cash or stock, plus the option to carry on developing it. That way it continues to be useful to them yet they don't have to pay for the costs of running it (servers, bandwidth, support, etc). I doubt they'd have held out for lots of money.
User avatar
arjan.top
Forum Contributor
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Hoče, Slovenia

Re: Small tool

Post by arjan.top »

maybe they wont pay millions for the technology, but they would pay millions for the user base
User avatar
dude81
Forum Regular
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:26 am
Location: Pearls City

Re: Small tool

Post by dude81 »

There you make my point. Even I was meaning that. :wink:
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: Small tool

Post by onion2k »

arjan.top wrote:maybe they wont pay millions for the technology, but they would pay millions for the user base
I don't think Google need to buy a user base.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Small tool

Post by alex.barylski »

I agree, it's the user base most companies are after, even Google.
User avatar
Christopher
Site Administrator
Posts: 13596
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: New York, NY, US

Re: Small tool

Post by Christopher »

The interesting thing about ReCaptcha is that it solves two problems at once. It provides a Captcha for websites to use and it provides human translations of words that character recognition software could not identify. The latter is why Carnegie Mellon University created it and why it is of interest to Google. They provide some bandwidth for a service and get a lot of goodwill and statistics. And in turn they have millions of humans working on their book scanning project for free. I think it is good of them to not just create GooCaptcha and steal the market. That's what big companies, like Microsoft, have traditionally done.
(#10850)
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Small tool

Post by alex.barylski »

http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/09/ ... -takeover/
Neither company has revealed the full terms of the buyout, but Google is unlikely to receive much change from $500 million.
I'm guessing that is ballpark what Google paid...it does sound like a neat service I had no idea how it worked until I read the article on SitePoint :)
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: Small tool

Post by onion2k »

$500m Would work out to ~$5,000 per user. That's mental, even for Google.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Small tool

Post by alex.barylski »

Thats business :P

Google might spend 5 million on a advertising campaign for a similar service, not to mention the cost to build the software, etc. Then there is the very real possibility, that no one bites. It actually makes cost effective sense to just buy out a company like reCAPTCHA, IMHO.

It's a guaranteed investment. :)
User avatar
califdon
Jack of Zircons
Posts: 4484
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: California, USA

Re: Small tool

Post by califdon »

Gee, when I read the Subject of this topic, I thought it was off-topic, but we don't have a Medical Issues forum . . .
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Re: Small tool

Post by onion2k »

PCSpectra wrote:Thats business :P

Google might spend 5 million on a advertising campaign for a similar service, not to mention the cost to build the software, etc. Then there is the very real possibility, that no one bites. It actually makes cost effective sense to just buy out a company like reCAPTCHA, IMHO.

It's a guaranteed investment. :)
I'm not disputing the relevance of ReCaptcha to Google, I'm merely disputing the value of it. Why $500m? Why not $50m? Or $5m?
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Small tool

Post by alex.barylski »

I'm not disputing the relevance of ReCaptcha to Google, I'm merely disputing the value of it. Why $500m? Why not $50m? Or $5m?
No idea man. I guess if either of us could answer that quesiton, we'd probably be wealthly businessmen as well? :P
Post Reply