Wireless networking safe or sorry?

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
JAM
DevNet Resident
Posts: 2101
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Wireless networking safe or sorry?

Post by JAM »

Girlfriend annoyed me to near death about not having networking upstairs, hence no internet access and so on, on that computer...

Cables couldn't used due to the layout. So I got myself a wireless router, and a bunch of cards (coughed up a kiddney when paying the bill, but...).

Works fine, no hazzle installing, easy to figure out yada yada. Then i noticed the encryption, WEP, settings and bumped those up to 128bit. I had to just because I could.

But how unsafe is it really, transfering data wireless. I have no clue, but it sounds that 128bit (and using an encryption key of my choise) is very, very safe. Is this an assumption or am I correct? I don't care enough to go investigating on my own but I was hoping that someone have some experience or thoughts to offer.
User avatar
m3mn0n
PHP Evangelist
Posts: 3548
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

Post by m3mn0n »

As long as the default network login/admin pass have been changed it's pretty tough to get in. Wireless networking is fairly new so a lot of the products out there are pretty sturdy when it comes to security and encryption.

But since it is internet connect that would be you biggest concern for data theft, rather than local signal hyjacking.

That's only from my experiences with it though. :)
User avatar
volka
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 8391
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 9:48 am
Location: Berlin, ger

Post by volka »

Serveral conceptional faults were found in WEP, esp. the handshake is far from safe. There is an ever-growing community of WLAN hoppers making fun out of finding open or poorly secured access points (although most of them do not seem to intend to play tricks on your network). A "convention" took place here were I live about two month ago.
afaik a wep128-only accesspoint is no problem anymore if someone is determined to enter your network but you can cascade security mechanism to increase privacy (MAC-table, vpn, ...)
qads
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1199
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 10:02 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by qads »

i use a wireless card, i didn't bother to use encryption, where i live its very safe lol..but after reading this i am little worried :? .

one question: would't encryption make things slower? i have to access my php server from my laptop and open a 5kb file over 11mb network connection takes about 3 secs atm 8O. if goes any slower i'll just go to sleep :P
User avatar
volka
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 8391
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 9:48 am
Location: Berlin, ger

Post by volka »

hm, I can't really tell you, only so much: atm I'm working with a vpn-dialin and a friend sometime dials in on my box at the same time (also vpn) and I can't notice any difference in the systemload, the only limiting factor is my inet-connection ;)

Maybe you find some information at
http://www.intel.com/eBusiness/pdf/it/wp021306.pdf (which is clearly targeted at decision makers ;-) )
and http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IEEE/

I shouldn't read more of this because each week I have to force myself not! to buy a wireless kit. I really don't need it, no I really do ..not... can't.. live without it... argggh...
qads
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1199
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 10:02 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by qads »

hmm...too much to read :?

my files should be safe cos my main computer uses a firewall, without me allowing the ip address to access the internet and the network, there is noting can be done :D.
Post Reply