Google's Complex URLs

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Ambush Commander
DevNet Master
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: New Jersey, US

Google's Complex URLs

Post by Ambush Commander »

First of all, Google isn't web standards compliant (but then again, neither are the DevNetwork Forums). But that's not really my question.

I'm just wondering: why does Google insist on dumping loads of extra parameters in my query strings? For instance, I google "php" from my FireFox search bar, and I get this URL:

http://www.google.com/search?q=php&star ... S:official

A bit long, don't you think? Even a google from the front page gives you this:

http://www.google.com/search?biw=984&hl ... gle+Search

Now, I don't know what half these parameters mean, but I do know that all I need is the "q" param, that is:

http://www.google.com/search?q=php

Will work perfectly fine. So why all the extra parameters? Have you ever run into this problem in web programming?
method_man
Forum Contributor
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:38 am

Post by method_man »

that is interesting
those url's r like twice as long
User avatar
Burrito
Spockulator
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Eden, Utah

Post by Burrito »

maybe they're collecting data???

google is a tough nut to crack from all angles...damn google!
method_man
Forum Contributor
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:38 am

Post by method_man »

8O
dont say that about google!!!
it is our god...
Syranide
Forum Contributor
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Syranide »

if you look they aren't so strange at all
- one is your query
- one is the start index
- two are the character encoding
- one is the language (or something like that)
- one is the browser

they probably send those parameters to track down if they need any "fixes" on the sight (such as with CSS and so on), I wouldn't think they used it for statistics, they wouldn't have used them as variables then.
User avatar
Burrito
Spockulator
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Eden, Utah

Post by Burrito »

don't get me wrong, I love google...well I should say I have a love/hate relationship with it.

I love it cause I use it all the time, I hate it cause it's tough to get ranked well on it for any consistently long period of time.

I've had a really hard time since the Florida update a few years back, damn Florida update nearly put me out of business...I hate google. :evil:

ok, I gotta go find a new hard drive, anyone know a good search engine to look on?
User avatar
phpScott
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 6:51 pm
Location: Keele, U.K.

Post by phpScott »

msn, ducks and runs away real quick :D
User avatar
Burrito
Spockulator
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Eden, Utah

Post by Burrito »

Syranide wrote:they probably send those parameters to track down if they need any "fixes" on the sight (such as with CSS and so on), I wouldn't think they used it for statistics, they wouldn't have used them as variables then.
not arguing for the sake of arguing, but what difference is there in tracking down fixes with url params and collecting stats with url params. obviously they could do either/both w/o the url params, so I guess I don't see your point?

only thing I can think is let's say someone just copies the url and sends it to a friend or pastes it for later viewing: with everything in the url, they could better "track" info, which really doesn't make a helluva lotta sense given that the friend might be running netscrape etc.

I don't have a clue, just speculating...
Syranide
Forum Contributor
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Syranide »

if you disregard of the browser being sent everything is pretty logical to me, but the browser, I don't know about the browser, but I can say as much as it doesn't show up with me.
User avatar
Ambush Commander
DevNet Master
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: New Jersey, US

Post by Ambush Commander »

if you disregard of the browser being sent everything is pretty logical to me, but the browser, I don't know about the browser, but I can say as much as it doesn't show up with me.
Well, actually, that's more of Mozilla's fault. Hmmm... that's interesting.
User avatar
JayBird
Admin
Posts: 4524
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:02 am
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Post by JayBird »

Syranide wrote:...if they need any "fixes" on the sight...
You mean with glasses 8)

:lol:
Post Reply