Bumping topics

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

alvinphp
Forum Contributor
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:47 am

Bumping topics

Post by alvinphp »

So, I was browsing old topics as I was bored. I came across some I found interesting so I responded to them with valid non trivial responses. They were then locked so I am quite confused. The reason was Necromancy, but this clearly is not the case as I am not posting a reply just to bring it to the top of active threads. I am genuinely responding to a thread I found interesting.

Now if they are going to stay locked, should I just create a new thread on the same subect as it is something I would like to talk about and I feel is still relevant now?
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

accepted behaviour is creating a new thread.
Roja
Tutorials Group
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:30 pm

Post by Roja »

I've been wondering when this was going to become an issue.

Honestly, if the rules want to prevent users from thread necromancy, the forum should be configured to autolock topics after the restricted number of days.. say, 90 days. (Very few topics are really active after 90 days).

It happens fairly often (or else we wouldnt need a rule for it, yes?), and people seem to get bored often.

Personally, I don't look five posts back to see if the thread was necro'd.. if its an interesting topic, and there is a post on it, I reply. As a result, if there aren't active mods locking at will, it can get messy fast. Thats why the autolock would be a great mod to add.

Just my two cents.
alvinphp
Forum Contributor
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:47 am

Post by alvinphp »

Well, if that is the rules then I will honor them (even though I think this one is a little over board). :?
User avatar
m3mn0n
PHP Evangelist
Posts: 3548
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

Post by m3mn0n »

There is no point in bumping them. The people who posted there are most likely long gone and won't respond so it's better to get a fresh one going for the sake of conversation.

You can't have a conversation with 3 year old accounts that don't login.
User avatar
Nathaniel
Forum Contributor
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: Arkansas, USA

Post by Nathaniel »

Does the mod lock it after no one has posted for 90 days? That would be better than just locking it once 90 days are up.

Edit: I don't see why we need a mod. Just say something in the forum rules about it.
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

There shouldn't be a reason to say anything in the rules.. it's common netiquette to not resurrect very old threads. Bumping isn't the issue here, it's necrothreading, which is slightly different, but on the whole, in the realm of common sense.

We shouldn't have to lock very old threads.
User avatar
JayBird
Admin
Posts: 4524
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:02 am
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Post by JayBird »

Yes, i think this is all down to common sense IMO. No need to have a rule for the smallest thing like this.

For example, we dont explicitly have a rule for refraining from posting in ALL CAPS, but we dont allow it, as many other forums don't. It's netiquette and common sense all rolled into one nice package.
Roja
Tutorials Group
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:30 pm

Post by Roja »

Pimptastic wrote:Yes, i think this is all down to common sense IMO. No need to have a rule for the smallest thing like this.
The difference between common sense and a rule?

The need to enforce it. :)

The fact that it happens here about twice a week lends itself to being an issue there should be a rule for, as its clear that this bit of "common sense" isn't that common (at least among our readers).
Sami wrote:You can't have a conversation with 3 year old accounts that don't login.
The threads in question were the perfect counter-example. Because the movie was popular ("Office Space"), the lack of the original posters had little impact.. plenty of new people were/are willing to discuss it. Thats the danger with necrothreading - because the topics are popular, they can pop back up over, and over, and over again.

Thats why many of the forums with rules against it have a mod that autolocks them. Its a control that enforces the rule.
User avatar
Buddha443556
Forum Regular
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:51 pm

Post by Buddha443556 »

Personally, I'm glad Feyd lock the "OOP" thread last night because I almost replied to that one ... :oops:

Someone else seemed to be necromancing yesterday but I noticed those threads weren't locked. Do celebrities get special consideration? Not that I'm complaining, I was hoping for some insights into PHP security. :wink:
User avatar
shiznatix
DevNet Master
Posts: 2745
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Contact:

Post by shiznatix »

in 3 years im going to bump this thread. then laugh, laugh like a evil villan. :twisted:
pilau
Forum Regular
Posts: 594
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:22 am
Location: Israel

Post by pilau »

I agree we Pimptastic and with Feyd.
We shouldn't lock threads that are 90 months old.. More of the matter not automatically.

People should just bare in minds: when taking a walk on the old streets of DevNet, check the date numbers 8)
User avatar
s.dot
Tranquility In Moderation
Posts: 5001
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:18 pm
Location: Indiana

Post by s.dot »

hmm I'm more along the lines of ... who cares

I've been using these forums since February and topic bumping doesn't seem to be much of a major problem. I think the current rules are A-OK ;)
Set Search Time - A google chrome extension. When you search only results from the past year (or set time period) are displayed. Helps tremendously when using new technologies to avoid outdated results.
alvinphp
Forum Contributor
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:47 am

Post by alvinphp »

If we go with common sense then what is the reasoning for locking threads simply because they are old? As long as they are still relevant and current posters find it interesting should it not not matter how old it is? And in most boards it is usually worse to create a topic that already exists in the database.

And these past old topics that came up is not necromancy. At least not necromancy as defined by Wikipedia. Necromancy is bumping a very old thread for the sole purpose of bringing it back to the top by either using the word 'bump' or making a trivial reply. I did neither as my sole purpose was to reply to a topic I found interesting.

I always enjoy looking near the back of a forum as you find some off the most interesting topics that were forgotten a long time ago, but are still relevant today. This is the first time in my life I have seen a topic locked simply because it was too old.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_necromancy
Last edited by alvinphp on Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Charles256
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1375
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:06 pm

Post by Charles256 »

:: repeats what alvin said:
Post Reply