Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:52 pm
And this shows exactly how "flexible" CSS can be:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:G7 ... om/+&hl=en
Besides, most of their designs share the same layout, use absolute positioning and are not functional by any means.
PS: This forum uses tables. Many websites of major IT corporations (IBM, Apple, Intel) use tables. Goolge uses tables. Artemiy Lebedev (quite famous Russian designer) uses tables. All this elithist <span style='color:blue' title='I'm naughty, are you naughty?'>smurf</span> about "most of the best developers" using CSS is based on nothing. I suggest CSS proponents to use facts about the technology, rather than some ego-driven assumprions about people using it.
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:G7 ... om/+&hl=en
Besides, most of their designs share the same layout, use absolute positioning and are not functional by any means.
Nope. Please note that the text is in the middle of the picture. Besides, CSS tends to fall apart when you add new stuff to the page (see the link above). It's easy to say "you can do X with CSS", but it's darn hard to do implement X in real-life website with dynamic content. All those "uber cool" CSS-P sites are quite simple structurally. And... heck, they look alike. They can't use full-height columns, so they don't. They can't nest things too deep, so the don't do it as well. Either that, or they resor to awfull browser-specific hacks, whcih are much worse than tables could ever be.What you illustrated is actually quite easy in CSS by using "float:left" for the picture.
Been there already. I have also visited bluerobot, positioneverything and half a dozen of other CSS-P sites. I sill think CSS suck(s) at positioning.http://www.csszengarden.com Rolling EyesCSS sucks at positioning
PS: This forum uses tables. Many websites of major IT corporations (IBM, Apple, Intel) use tables. Goolge uses tables. Artemiy Lebedev (quite famous Russian designer) uses tables. All this elithist <span style='color:blue' title='I'm naughty, are you naughty?'>smurf</span> about "most of the best developers" using CSS is based on nothing. I suggest CSS proponents to use facts about the technology, rather than some ego-driven assumprions about people using it.