Big companies? Are they better, or something? But I will play along...
http://www.apple.com/ - Invalid
http://www.google.com/ - Invalid
http://www.hp.com/ - Invalid
http://www.ibm.com/ - Invalid
http://www.intel.com/ - Invalid
http://www.macromedia.com/ - Invalid
http://www.novell.com/ - Almost valid (1 error)
http://www.oracle.com/ - Invalid
http://www.sun.com/ - Invalid
http://www.yahoo.com/ - Invalid
Now get this: I only tested 12 companies for this list.
Ok, back to your list. Anyone can make their frontpage to comply with W3C standards. But how about the whole site?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/Sear ... laylang=en - Invalid
http://www.opera.com/download/ - Invalid
http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/ - Valid. Well, whadayaknow.
http://www.adobe.com/products/main.html - Invalid
http://www.att.com/gov/ - Almost valid (1 error)
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Conten ... on-en.html - Invalid
http://www.loc.gov/folklife/ - Valid.
http://www.umich.edu/news/MT/NewsE/11_05/ - Invalid.
http://www.progeny.net/products/ - Valid. Who are those people anyway?
And those are W3C freakin' members. Not like it proves something, but still, such results raise certain questions.
Just out of curiosity, what would you change in XHTML/CSS?
Moderator: General Moderators