Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:36 pm
Thanks for clearing that up for me.Roja wrote:Only if the server is configured to parse html as php.nickman013 wrote:Would the php work?
But doing so means it is a php file, despite the .html extension.
A community of PHP developers offering assistance, advice, discussion, and friendship.
http://forums.devnetwork.net/
Thanks for clearing that up for me.Roja wrote:Only if the server is configured to parse html as php.nickman013 wrote:Would the php work?
But doing so means it is a php file, despite the .html extension.
But URL's like that are better for High Geeks to navigate with.Roja wrote:Misleading. For the major search engines, that used to be true, but isn't any longer.Sami wrote:You might have heard it's better to have say: site/user/1062/
Roja wrote:Only if the server is configured to parse html as php.nickman013 wrote:Would the php work?
But doing so means it is a php file, despite the .html extension.
Can and should are very different things. The option is provided so that if you are converting a site from one technology to another, you can do so without breaking links. For example, if this forum switched to one powered by Perl, with .pl extensions, every link to every page here would have to be updated. (Including links from other sites).a94060 wrote:it might be off topic,but
why would there be other extensions(shtml,cfm,asp,etc) if all can be parsed even if they had the extension of and html page? It would seem very redundant