Massively improved in version 1.5 (at least in linux)AKA Panama Jack wrote:Firefox might be decent if it didn't suck up memory like a wino locked in a liquor store.nickman013 wrote:I hate Opera, I use Safari (when on mac) and Firefox(when on windows).AKA Panama Jack wrote: I think it would be better if it was linked to Opera instead. You know the better browser.
MS is not amused
Moderator: General Moderators
- Chris Corbyn
- Breakbeat Nuttzer
- Posts: 13098
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: MS is not amused
Re: MS is not amused
We've already discussed this one: viewtopic.php?p=236715#236715AKA Panama Jack wrote:Firefox might be decent if it didn't suck up memory like a wino locked in a liquor store.
33% more memory than Opera (with considerably more functionality) is hardly "sucking up memory like a wino".
Especially when we're talking about <30mb of memory total, at a time when 1,000+ is standard.
- AKA Panama Jack
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:21 pm
Re: MS is not amused
Let Firefox run for a while with a number of web pages open. Especially if they use flash.Roja wrote:We've already discussed this one: viewtopic.php?p=236715#236715AKA Panama Jack wrote:Firefox might be decent if it didn't suck up memory like a wino locked in a liquor store.
33% more memory than Opera (with considerably more functionality) is hardly "sucking up memory like a wino".
Especially when we're talking about <30mb of memory total, at a time when 1,000+ is standard.
But enough of this.
What is kind of sad is that they have had that domain registered since 1999.
Record created on 08-Mar-1999.
This is really sad...
http://www.ie8.com
http://www.ie9.com
http://www.ie10.com
http://www.ie11.com
and there are more. They are all basically domain parked for the future. All of these people hoping to make money from MS in the future. Most were created years ago.
-
alex.barylski
- DevNet Evangelist
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
This thread is referencing a joke, what you are referencing is not a joke.
To make it clear, I'm not referencing eCommunism thread (the last part of my last post there was, indeed, wrong). I'm referencing another thread, which was deleted. And that thread linked to parody, so technically it was a joke.Thats substantially different from your thread, which attacked general concepts, offered no alternatives, little reasoning, and proceeded to continue that same process against the individuals stating opposing opinions.