Sad Day
Moderator: General Moderators
Since this is the USA, land of the free, i would think that you're free to by MCI products or not... If you don't like their policy you can simply act against it by not buying their products.. That's the way free-markets work..
I think there was a forum about politics where this sort of messages would be on-topic...
I think there was a forum about politics where this sort of messages would be on-topic...
- Christopher
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 13596
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 7:54 pm
- Location: New York, NY, US
I thought the USA was the land of the corporate welfare state. It ends up that "free markets" means that companies are free to behave as they want -- usually the same and badly -- not that consumers are free to make choices among companies that behave differently. The telco market in the US is just one of many examples of this.timvw wrote:Since this is the USA, land of the free, i would think that you're free to by MCI products or not... If you don't like their policy you can simply act against it by not buying their products.. That's the way free-markets work..
(#10850)
- RobertGonzalez
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 14293
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:04 pm
- Location: Fremont, CA, USA
MCI is just following the trend in corporate America. It's a crazy cycle, but it has to be expected. If outsourcing leads to greater corporate profits then these companies are doing what they are supposed to: maximize their business earning potential by minimizing costs. This allows them to keep their prices relatively stable while being able to stay in business.
Is the a publicy appealing way to do things? No. But if it was your company, and you had millions of dollars in overhead (not just salaries either, all the things that go along with employees) and an opportunity came up for you to be able to minimize this overhead utilizing various methods, including outsourcing, wouldn't you do it? It is certainly not what people want to see, but in our economy today, it is almost necessary. Unless you are Toyota. They just seem to dodge all of these types of bullets.
Is the a publicy appealing way to do things? No. But if it was your company, and you had millions of dollars in overhead (not just salaries either, all the things that go along with employees) and an opportunity came up for you to be able to minimize this overhead utilizing various methods, including outsourcing, wouldn't you do it? It is certainly not what people want to see, but in our economy today, it is almost necessary. Unless you are Toyota. They just seem to dodge all of these types of bullets.
- AKA Panama Jack
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:21 pm
Re: Sad Day
Chuckle, I am not surprised. They really should have closed down earlier.agtlewis wrote:I worked here years ago, you could write your own paycheck there. Nothing last forever though.
http://ozarksnow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti ... 1/60428003
The friends who worked there said it was very high pressure and the turn over rate was astronomical as people either burned out quickly or left because they couldn't make any money. Most people left because they couldn't make anything because what you made was based upon what you sold. Also, you had to make a certain number of phone calls per hour or you were penalized.
Cult-like, sweatshop calling center...
I guess there are quite a few desperate people in Springfield considering the very high turn over rate.
How would you like a job where you had to make hundreds of phone calls a day and over 90% of those phone calls the people either hung up on you or cussed you out.
- Christopher
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 13596
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 7:54 pm
- Location: New York, NY, US
Perhaps simplistic, short term goals like "greater corporate profits" and "maximize their business earning potential" are not that desireable (See Toyota). But America seems addicted to simplistic, short term goals (as, history has shown, are most empires on the way down).Everah wrote:If outsourcing leads to greater corporate profits then these companies are doing what they are supposed to: maximize their business earning potential by minimizing costs.
(#10850)
Please visit http://political-nerds.org if you wand to finish this conversation.