Coming soon: The Web toll

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
hawleyjr
BeerMod
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Jax FL & Spokane WA USA

Coming soon: The Web toll

Post by hawleyjr »

Do you guys think this will actually pass?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/0 ... index.html
Specifically, such companies want to charge Web sites for the speedy delivery of streaming video, television, movies and other high-bandwidth data to their customers. If they get their way (Congress may vote on the matter before the year is out), the days of wide-open cyberspace are numbered.
User avatar
Maugrim_The_Reaper
DevNet Master
Posts: 2704
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Ireland

Post by Maugrim_The_Reaper »

Is this not pre-empted by the recently passed net neutrality bill, at least in the US?
User avatar
Maugrim_The_Reaper
DevNet Master
Posts: 2704
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Ireland

Post by Maugrim_The_Reaper »

I doubt it will pass - surely any idiot can see it will handing higher bandwidth to paying websites must at some point leave less bandwidth for other non-paying sites. Is bandwidth a commodity now? It's a nice play - a commodity is valuable when it's supply starts at zero-cost.
User avatar
Luke
The Ninja Space Mod
Posts: 6424
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Paradise, CA

Post by Luke »

I hate it... removes all that I love about the internet... just like the last paragraph says.
User avatar
hawleyjr
BeerMod
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Jax FL & Spokane WA USA

Post by hawleyjr »

Maugrim_The_Reaper wrote:Is bandwidth a commodity now?
Actually it is. bandwidth is expensive and unlike your home internet account, most companies have to pay for specific bandwith amounts.

Don't get me wrong, I'm against it especially as a small business owner who's customers are all small businesses this is a bad idea.
User avatar
RobertGonzalez
Site Administrator
Posts: 14293
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Fremont, CA, USA

Post by RobertGonzalez »

Seems like a typical business tactic. Take something that is convenient and marketable, get people hooked on it and then try to charge people money for creating a 'better' version of it. Started with radio, being broadcast for free (to consumers) while broadcasters generated revenue from businesses using that media to get their advertisements out. Now there is Sirius, XM and HD Radio. You mean, I can pay for something that is usually free so I can have a 'better' experience with it? Sign me up!

Then it moved to TV. Same concept. Free local UHF/VHF transmission. Then came cable, which you had to pay for. Then satellite, on demand, blah blah blah. Again, sign me up!

Now the internet has hit it's point of moving up into a specialized media offering. You had to know it would get to this point. Will that idea ever pass? Who knows? I'm sure if you asked people years ago if they would pay for radio they would have given a resounding 'Heck No!'. Now look where we are.

Anyway, I am starting to push the boundaries of getting political so I will kindly step down from my soapbox and resume my laidback lifestyle as a coder and DevNet junkie.
timvw
DevNet Master
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Leuven, Belgium

Post by timvw »

I don't see why politics should interfere with this...

If you don't like a product (eg: one that differentiates allowed bandwith depending on what you use it for), don't buy it.. I don't see why laws are needed for that...
Roja
Tutorials Group
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:30 pm

Post by Roja »

timvw wrote:If you don't like a product (eg: one that differentiates allowed bandwith depending on what you use it for), don't buy it.. I don't see why laws are needed for that...
Its a lot like electricity. If you don't like the rates your local power provider charges, or how they do business (nuclear/coal?), you can't really not buy it, can you?

In some areas, there is a near defacto monopoly being granted to providers. In rural areas, its your local phone company, or you are SOL for getting any connectivity. (Nevermind the discussion about getting broadband there!)

As a result, there is a strong argument to be made that the government has an interest in ensuring that customers aren't abused. By keeping nuetrality in force, they enable competition on the merits - a commodity competition - instead of letting companies gouge customers.

Unfortunately, like most things political, its not nearly that cut and dried. In the cities, its pretty much the opposite situation. You can have one of a hundred providers, ranging from dialup to satellite, cellular to powerline, even wireless! In that environment, forced neutrality isn't ensuring choice of providers on an equal basis - its limiting businesses ability to compete aggressively.

For example, if Earthlink could charge $0.10 a minute for anyone accessing Google, they might be able to fund nationwide free dialup for everyone that doesn't already have it.

Thats a pretty serious competitive advantage, and it could help people in rural areas considerably.

There are substantial pros and cons to both sides of the equation, and its definitely a political issue with serious ramifications to both business, and our livelihood as programmers. In the final equation, it comes down to guessing which choice will be better, and time and again, politics proves to be extremely poor at predicting the future.
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

:( So naughty streaming feeds may be out of the question?

/ponders what the internet would be like without pr0n.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

A cold, dry, boring place...

It'd be EOL for me as an active internet user :P
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

Guys, this is a political discussion.. and should probably be taken elsewhere... *hint-hint*
Post Reply