missing HD space

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

missing HD space

Post by vchris »

I just bought a 300gb Seagate HD. It's installed and working great except there is only 280gb available when it says other places I have 300gb. BIOS says 300gb, another tool from seagate says just a bit more than 300gb... I know the file system takes space but 20gb????

Is this normal?!
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

yes.
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

hmmm ok :?
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

What filesystem are you using?
User avatar
MrPotatoes
Forum Regular
Posts: 617
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post by MrPotatoes »

Note: 1 MB = 1,048,576 Bytes; 1 GB = 1,024 MB

just an FYI. i hate it
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

I'm using NTFS
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

NTFS has a large protective section built into the allocation tables. In XP's NTFS, NTFS 5, there's even more added data kept in the tables above previous versions.

It should be noted that most, if not all, hard drive manufacturers list the size as unformated capacity and that they note that formated, the size will be smaller.
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

Alright so this is totally normal then...
User avatar
MrPotatoes
Forum Regular
Posts: 617
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post by MrPotatoes »

totally.

i've never been happy about it either. i think some people tried to have the manufacturers actually stop claiming those high numbers
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

Funny because when I called the shop where I bought my HD from they also said it was normal and it was kind of a rip off lol
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

What do you mean a rip off? The hard disk does have a capacity as specified. The space taken up is not to do with the hardware, it's like feyd says, the filesystem (software level).

Try formatting it as ReiserFS, Ext3, FAT32 and NTFS and see what happens to the free space each time. The manufacturer can't make the drive morph into a bigger drive because some of the space is used by the filesystem itself.
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

Rip off because you buy a 300gb but you don't get 300gb. With NTFS you get 280gb... Kinda sucks if you ask me... How can a file system take 20gb of space?
User avatar
Maugrim_The_Reaper
DevNet Master
Posts: 2704
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Ireland

Post by Maugrim_The_Reaper »

How does a filesystem know how and where to find allocated data blocks for all files across a magnetised disk with a few gazillion 0/1 charged areas?
User avatar
Chris Corbyn
Breakbeat Nuttzer
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Chris Corbyn »

Maugrim_The_Reaper wrote:How does a filesystem know how and where to find allocated data blocks for all files across a magnetised disk with a few gazillion 0/1 charged areas?
My Point exactly. A filesystem is essentially a database. A hardisk by itself doesn't know anything (ok, it knows how to check itself for basic errors and how to initialize).

By the way, NTFS isn't known for being the most efficient in terms of storage space. Try some other filesystems on other operating systems and it might make more sense what we're talking about.
vchris
Forum Contributor
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Canada, Quebec

Post by vchris »

Well I only have win XP so I guess NTFS will do.
Post Reply