SEO friendly links

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

Post Reply
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

SEO friendly links

Post by alex.barylski »

Not sure if this belongs here or not, but WTF right? :P

I have a page which has many of it's links stored in a drop down...the dropdown when selected is inside a FORM which sets an ID (representing a link) and stores that ID in a $_SESSION

I can't see a search engine being smart enough to iterate through the combobox items and submitting, etc...

So I figured I should probably have a list of links which do the same...
index.php?action=setid&pageid=12
I will have about 300 of these links at any given time...so obviously making them visible to end users is out of the question...I figure I could have a seperate page which displayed a sitemap of sorts...

But incase I choose not to do this...

Would it be wise to have those links inside a display: none DIV at the beginning of the page? If CSS is somehow disabled would the element display? Do search engines check CSS attributes?

Any input on the matter? Not looking for whether you think this is bad design or not ;)

Cheers :)
User avatar
DaveTheAve
Forum Contributor
Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

Post by DaveTheAve »

Why not include them in a sitemap? If your gonna include them in a hidden div then your looking at TONS of wasted bandwidth and higher load times.
User avatar
Burrito
Spockulator
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Eden, Utah

Post by Burrito »

putting keywords in a hidden div is a huge no-no for SEO anyway. If you get caught doing that, you'll likely be penalized and suffer the reverse effect of what you're after.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

Hmm...they still go after people for that eh? I thought that was no longer a big issue as search engines detected repeat keywrods, etc and banned you automatically...

These links are genuine...won't flag any kind of warning...so unless someone manually see's my page...

In anycase, sounds like a sitemap it is :P

Thanks :)
User avatar
Jenk
DevNet Master
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:24 am
Location: London

Post by Jenk »

It's the "invisibility" that is the no-no, search engines are trying to achieve as close to the human user experience as possible, and rate sites based upon that info. So sites that are caught displaying one thing to users, and displaying something else to search engines, are penalised. (This is within reason - some sites do show a 'cut down' version to search engines, which is acceptable)

A sitemap sounds the best route, or simply display all of your links (but as you have 100's, a sitemap sounds better option)
User avatar
John Cartwright
Site Admin
Posts: 11470
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 2:10 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by John Cartwright »

This is a BlackHat technique, and can get you banned from google if they find out.
User avatar
Luke
The Ninja Space Mod
Posts: 6424
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Paradise, CA

Post by Luke »

I'll jump on that bandwagon... Image BAD HOCKEY!! NO INVISIBLE LINKS! BAD!!
User avatar
John Cartwright
Site Admin
Posts: 11470
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 2:10 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by John Cartwright »

Makes me wonder though, considering there are many instances where this would be legitamate in a website. Togglable navigations for instance, hmm..
User avatar
hawleyjr
BeerMod
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Jax FL & Spokane WA USA

Post by hawleyjr »

Jcart wrote:Makes me wonder though, considering there are many instances where this would be legitamate in a website. Togglable navigations for instance, hmm..
Generally togglable navigation would be to the site it self and not external sites. It's when you hide a bunch of links to sites. Another thing I've found is it doesn't matter who you link to it matters who links to you...
User avatar
Luke
The Ninja Space Mod
Posts: 6424
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Paradise, CA

Post by Luke »

I'm pretty sure linking to relevant sites helps a little... just not as much as relevant sites linking to you... but I'm not an SEO expert by any means.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

Jenk wrote:It's the "invisibility" that is the no-no, search engines are trying to achieve as close to the human user experience as possible, and rate sites based upon that info. So sites that are caught displaying one thing to users, and displaying something else to search engines, are penalised. (This is within reason - some sites do show a 'cut down' version to search engines, which is acceptable)

A sitemap sounds the best route, or simply display all of your links (but as you have 100's, a sitemap sounds better option)
Didn't even think of that...I wonder if I could check the referrer and if it's a register search engine, show only content...hmmmm...

I still agree a sitemap is the way to go...but still...I can't help but think maybe :P
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

First of all...stay off using words like familiarization or togglable in any of my posts...I can't read them out loud then as I can't seem to pronounce those damn words :P

Secondly....these links are completely internal links...pointing to my own documents...and yes it's well known or at least heard of, that incoming links matter way more than outgoing...so I agree with that statement :)
Post Reply