What impresses you on a website?
Moderator: General Moderators
What impresses you on a website?
We've all been using the web for a few years at least now. We've probably seen ideas come and ideas go. Myself, I started at this over 10 years ago now. I tested my first site in Mosaic. I've seen frames rise and fall, Javascript come and go and come back again, VRML ... well, flop from the off really. I've witnessed Flash's prolific explosion, and then calming. The biggest change I've seen is the growth of scripting and databases. Starting with small things like contact forms and ecards, through the crazy rise of ecommerce and portals, and into todays massive user oriented websites. It's all come and a lot of it has gone again, and without a doubt every new technology has had me going "Woah! That's so cool!" at some point.
What impressed you most recently on the internet? Something AJAX? Flash? Audio? Video? Social networking? XML? VML?
What impressed you most recently on the internet? Something AJAX? Flash? Audio? Video? Social networking? XML? VML?
- RobertGonzalez
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 14293
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:04 pm
- Location: Fremont, CA, USA
+1. That is by far the coolest thing around... when a site uses technology to enhance its offering. At bare bones, it is still a functional informative markup document, but when the user has the tools enabled, it becomes a zinger of a user experience without the user even knowing about all the stuff behind the scenes.feyd wrote:Valid pages that degrade gracefully (upgrade unobtrusively.)
It's usually not the technology that I find impressive but how people overcome the challenges to implement the technology. Sort of like AppleTV, I'm not really woah'ed by it but when EETimes took AppleTV apart and analyzed it this week then AppleTV got a woah out of me. Wish there was an "Under the Hood" column for websites.
- Ollie Saunders
- DevNet Master
- Posts: 3179
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: UK
- superdezign
- DevNet Master
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:06 pm
-
alex.barylski
- DevNet Evangelist
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
That never even remotely cross my mind until about a year ago or so after a lengthly disscussion with...snap...whats his name? no longer a member...he took his ball and went home...Everah wrote:+1. That is by far the coolest thing around... when a site uses technology to enhance its offering. At bare bones, it is still a functional informative markup document, but when the user has the tools enabled, it becomes a zinger of a user experience without the user even knowing about all the stuff behind the scenes.feyd wrote:Valid pages that degrade gracefully (upgrade unobtrusively.)
Oh gees...I really can't remember, but anyways. After some lengthly disscussion with him and listening to others I realized that...he was right. A professional developer is not just limited to effectively using OOP, good practices, etc focusing on the backend but making the interface responsive and one that degrades gracefully.
It's a quick and easy sign that the application itself is likley developed slightly better than comparable apps. It takes skill and experience to pull off AJAX coated applications which work well in non-supporting browsers. Not just any hack can do it.
It's now become one of my many factors I include in my reviewing web applications for use.
+2 for me
-
alex.barylski
- DevNet Evangelist
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
I just started using Facebook. It is nice....waaaaay nicer experience than myGarbage...but does it degrade graceful?superdezign wrote:Well, as a developer, the stuff that impresses me is stuff that I use and think, "How the hell would I go about trying to make this??"
Facebook comes to mind.
I've seen a lot of applications which utilize AJAX to the nines but break under Opera or similar and disabling JS to actually hope in using the application doesn't help.
AJAX is cool but it's best when employed as a additional layer of interaction not dependent on it.
- Kieran Huggins
- DevNet Master
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:14 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
- Ollie Saunders
- DevNet Master
- Posts: 3179
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: UK
That doesn't apply to facebook. There's loads of things about it that are completely strange to a new user. Poking and wall-to-wall being prime examples.Kieran Huggins wrote:When something just works (and works well) with little to no learning curve, that's impressive. Facebook does this well, so does last.fm. It's way harder than it looks!
- jayshields
- DevNet Resident
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Leeds/Manchester, England
I think for me not much has changed in my perceptions of what makes a website impressive (ignoring technology changes), I still look for sites with a good strong design which is not too cluttered or over done, I like the navigation on a site to be clear and intuitive to use, nothing irritates me more than going round in circles like on some big companies website try to find a page I know is there. Features that work to this end often get a response of "wow thats cool" out of me, and to some extent ajax has been able to effect some of these things.
- CoderGoblin
- DevNet Resident
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:03 am
- Location: Aachen, Germany
The information I am after, where I expect it to be, with the minimum of effort (mouse clicks/typing).
All the graphics/features are pointless without this. You see too many sites trying to dazzle you with "features" but failing to get the content right. It is often the case that the "public" is impressed/has different expectations to the "technophiles" who write the pages. Being pretty can draw a person in. Without good content accessibility they are unlikely to come back on a regular basis.
All the graphics/features are pointless without this. You see too many sites trying to dazzle you with "features" but failing to get the content right. It is often the case that the "public" is impressed/has different expectations to the "technophiles" who write the pages. Being pretty can draw a person in. Without good content accessibility they are unlikely to come back on a regular basis.