What impresses you on a website?

Ye' old general discussion board. Basically, for everything that isn't covered elsewhere. Come here to shoot the breeze, shoot your mouth off, or whatever suits your fancy.
This forum is not for asking programming related questions.

Moderator: General Moderators

What did you last find really impressive on the web? Something made with...

AJAX
10
48%
Flash
1
5%
Multimedia (audio, video, images)
0
No votes
Social Networking (user generated content)
1
5%
XML (cross-site syndication, feeds, mashups)
2
10%
VML/Canvas (like Google maps)
2
10%
Something else.
5
24%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

What impresses you on a website?

Post by onion2k »

We've all been using the web for a few years at least now. We've probably seen ideas come and ideas go. Myself, I started at this over 10 years ago now. I tested my first site in Mosaic. I've seen frames rise and fall, Javascript come and go and come back again, VRML ... well, flop from the off really. I've witnessed Flash's prolific explosion, and then calming. The biggest change I've seen is the growth of scripting and databases. Starting with small things like contact forms and ecards, through the crazy rise of ecommerce and portals, and into todays massive user oriented websites. It's all come and a lot of it has gone again, and without a doubt every new technology has had me going "Woah! That's so cool!" at some point.

What impressed you most recently on the internet? Something AJAX? Flash? Audio? Video? Social networking? XML? VML?
User avatar
feyd
Neighborhood Spidermoddy
Posts: 31559
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Bothell, Washington, USA

Post by feyd »

Valid pages that degrade gracefully (upgrade unobtrusively.)
User avatar
RobertGonzalez
Site Administrator
Posts: 14293
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Fremont, CA, USA

Post by RobertGonzalez »

feyd wrote:Valid pages that degrade gracefully (upgrade unobtrusively.)
+1. That is by far the coolest thing around... when a site uses technology to enhance its offering. At bare bones, it is still a functional informative markup document, but when the user has the tools enabled, it becomes a zinger of a user experience without the user even knowing about all the stuff behind the scenes.
Arawn
Forum Commoner
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 6:03 am

Post by Arawn »

It's usually not the technology that I find impressive but how people overcome the challenges to implement the technology. Sort of like AppleTV, I'm not really woah'ed by it but when EETimes took AppleTV apart and analyzed it this week then AppleTV got a woah out of me. Wish there was an "Under the Hood" column for websites.
User avatar
Ollie Saunders
DevNet Master
Posts: 3179
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: UK

Post by Ollie Saunders »

Wish there was an "Under the Hood" column for websites.
Now that is a great idea.

Oh and I 100% agree with feyd. AJAX will probably be replaced by something else later. One day we may see the death of HTTP as we know it.
User avatar
superdezign
DevNet Master
Posts: 4135
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:06 pm

Post by superdezign »

Well, as a developer, the stuff that impresses me is stuff that I use and think, "How the hell would I go about trying to make this??"

Facebook comes to mind.
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

Everah wrote:
feyd wrote:Valid pages that degrade gracefully (upgrade unobtrusively.)
+1. That is by far the coolest thing around... when a site uses technology to enhance its offering. At bare bones, it is still a functional informative markup document, but when the user has the tools enabled, it becomes a zinger of a user experience without the user even knowing about all the stuff behind the scenes.
That never even remotely cross my mind until about a year ago or so after a lengthly disscussion with...snap...whats his name? no longer a member...he took his ball and went home... :P

Oh gees...I really can't remember, but anyways. After some lengthly disscussion with him and listening to others I realized that...he was right. A professional developer is not just limited to effectively using OOP, good practices, etc focusing on the backend but making the interface responsive and one that degrades gracefully.

It's a quick and easy sign that the application itself is likley developed slightly better than comparable apps. It takes skill and experience to pull off AJAX coated applications which work well in non-supporting browsers. Not just any hack can do it.

It's now become one of my many factors I include in my reviewing web applications for use.

+2 for me :)
alex.barylski
DevNet Evangelist
Posts: 6267
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Post by alex.barylski »

superdezign wrote:Well, as a developer, the stuff that impresses me is stuff that I use and think, "How the hell would I go about trying to make this??"

Facebook comes to mind.
I just started using Facebook. It is nice....waaaaay nicer experience than myGarbage...but does it degrade graceful?

I've seen a lot of applications which utilize AJAX to the nines but break under Opera or similar and disabling JS to actually hope in using the application doesn't help.

AJAX is cool but it's best when employed as a additional layer of interaction not dependent on it.
User avatar
Kieran Huggins
DevNet Master
Posts: 3635
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Kieran Huggins »

facebook does seem to degrade gracefully - I'm impressed all to hell.

I think the biggest wow factor for me is a good UI design. When something just works (and works well) with little to no learning curve, that's impressive. Facebook does this well, so does last.fm. It's way harder than it looks!
User avatar
Ollie Saunders
DevNet Master
Posts: 3179
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: UK

Post by Ollie Saunders »

Yes. What still shocks me is the amount of effort that has to go into producing an app. Its only when you have many people that things can go quickly.
User avatar
onion2k
Jedi Mod
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: usrlab.com

Post by onion2k »

Kieran Huggins wrote:When something just works (and works well) with little to no learning curve, that's impressive. Facebook does this well, so does last.fm. It's way harder than it looks!
That doesn't apply to facebook. There's loads of things about it that are completely strange to a new user. Poking and wall-to-wall being prime examples.
djot
Forum Contributor
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 10:21 am
Location: planet earth
Contact:

Post by djot »

-
If I see something, that looks good (new, interesting, fascinating), I am not impressed right away.
But "What impresses [s]you[/s] me on a website[s]?[/s]" is, if this fancy thing works, when I click (use) it.

djot
-
User avatar
jayshields
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Leeds/Manchester, England

Post by jayshields »

I use Facebook quite a lot and I occasionally read the developers blog. I've been looking into their API - that's awesome.

Although letting anyone release apps for anyone else to use with no approval from admins results in faulty apps.
User avatar
phpdevuk
Forum Contributor
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:31 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by phpdevuk »

I think for me not much has changed in my perceptions of what makes a website impressive (ignoring technology changes), I still look for sites with a good strong design which is not too cluttered or over done, I like the navigation on a site to be clear and intuitive to use, nothing irritates me more than going round in circles like on some big companies website try to find a page I know is there. Features that work to this end often get a response of "wow thats cool" out of me, and to some extent ajax has been able to effect some of these things.
User avatar
CoderGoblin
DevNet Resident
Posts: 1425
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Aachen, Germany

Post by CoderGoblin »

The information I am after, where I expect it to be, with the minimum of effort (mouse clicks/typing).

All the graphics/features are pointless without this. You see too many sites trying to dazzle you with "features" but failing to get the content right. It is often the case that the "public" is impressed/has different expectations to the "technophiles" who write the pages. Being pretty can draw a person in. Without good content accessibility they are unlikely to come back on a regular basis.
Post Reply