Page 2 of 3

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:15 am
by jaoudestudios
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
Because it is useless! I guess good for beginners.

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:19 am
by papa
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
It has it's own language. :)

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:25 am
by novice4eva
jaoudestudios wrote:
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
Because it is useless! I guess good for beginners.
Hummm maybe because it is not there in LINUX YET :lol:

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:36 am
by jaoudestudios
novice4eva wrote:
jaoudestudios wrote:
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
Because it is useless! I guess good for beginners.
Hummm maybe because it is not there in LINUX YET :lol:
Even if it was I would not use it! It is so heavy. But it has its purpose - beginners love it. When I was starting out as a developer (back in the day :P ), dreamweaver helped me a lot, and gave me other problems with inserting <span style='color:blue' title='I&#39;m naughty, are you naughty?'>smurf</span> code everywhere - but thats another story :) . Dreamweaver is probably a good wysiwyg editor.

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:00 am
by viraj
what about e-texteditor ? I love it specially the revision control.

And its going to have a linux version soon.

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:09 am
by jaoudestudios
Dont know that one, I will check it out :)

Wondered why my previous post had blue writing and the word smurf, it must be a bad word filter thing - have not seen it before so looked quite odd at first :)

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:26 am
by kaisellgren
jaoudestudios wrote:
kaisellgren wrote:Microsoft Windows Vista™ x64 Ultimate.
Nooooooooooooooooo, come on, seriously, duuuude! Windows? and Vista??? WTF?!?! I thought you were alright before this comment :P
Yeah I use Vista for gaming, but I try to keep it quiet!

Notepad++ for windows (at the office) - lightweight and does what it says on the box.

Linux I use Geany - same again, lightweight and does what it says on the box.
Well, I code small hobby games with DirectX and .NET Framework and so far I have not figured out how to do that comfortable in other OS'es. I'll move to Windows 7 ASAP though. I also got Ubuntu on my PC.

Anyway, NetBeans looks interesting. I'll give it a try :)

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:59 am
by VladSun
kaisellgren wrote:
jaoudestudios wrote:
kaisellgren wrote:Microsoft Windows Vista™ x64 Ultimate.
Nooooooooooooooooo, come on, seriously, duuuude! Windows? and Vista??? WTF?!?! I thought you were alright before this comment :P
Yeah I use Vista for gaming, but I try to keep it quiet!

Notepad++ for windows (at the office) - lightweight and does what it says on the box.

Linux I use Geany - same again, lightweight and does what it says on the box.
Well, I code small hobby games with DirectX and .NET Framework and so far I have not figured out how to do that comfortable in other OS'es. I'll move to Windows 7 ASAP though. I also got Ubuntu on my PC.
//offtopic

:oops:
The same with me - two big team projects with .NET framework, C# and MSSQL server

And YES!!! Finally figured out why the bloody grub keeps showing me error 22 message (No disk found?!? ) after install - I use the Select boot device BIOS feature which changes the device order and that's why the grub config file doesn't conform the system.

So, finally I can use Linux on my "primary", more powerful PC :) :) :)
Congrats to me! :)

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:40 am
by malcolmboston
Been using notepad++ for a while now on windows, super lightweight :)

Used Kate in *nix, god i wish that was available for windows because i loved that software so much :banghead:

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:44 pm
by kaisellgren
Hmm maybe I'll give Zend Studio & NuSphere a second try. I could try to code differently. But I'm not sure which one of these two to choose...

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:49 pm
by jaoudestudios
malcolmboston wrote:Been using notepad++ for a while now on windows, super lightweight :)

Used Kate in *nix, god i wish that was available for windows because i loved that software so much :banghead:
I installed Kate today, I will give it a go tomorrow - fingers are crossed & hoping it is similar to notepad++

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:37 pm
by josh
papa wrote:
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
It has it's own language. :)
No it doesn't and even if it did that doesn't mean anything :|

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:09 am
by papa
jshpro2 wrote:
papa wrote:
novice4eva wrote:Not a single mention of Macromedia Dreamweaver :roll:
It has it's own language. :)
No it doesn't and even if it did that doesn't mean anything :|
What I meant was, the code that's output isn't very nice...

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:12 am
by panic!
I like Coda, not an IDE per-se. But it suits me perfectly.

Re: Disappointed with PHP editors.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:24 am
by Apollo
PCSpectra wrote:UltraEdit is the best IMHO.

Very light weight, highly configurable.
+1

Another big UltraEdit fan here!